
Pope Benedict XVI has declared that the bones under Rome's Basilica of St. Paul are in fact the remains of Saul of Tarsis. How does His Holiness know this? He claims to know by scientific proof. The "scientific proof" that His Big-Hattedness refers to is carbon dating, which can only tell us that the remains are as old as Paul, not if it was actually Paul. You can read more about that here.
But the point of this post is not whether those are the remains of Paul. Personally, I could care less. I just wanted to highlight an example in a growing trend, and ask an important question: when did the scientific method become an accepted medium of divine revelation? Of course, the reason for the gradual (yet obviously incomplete) transition to a reliance on secular knowledge and science rather than arbitrary doctrine is clear: the Pope, in his wisdom, realizes that science works. Galileo is a black mark on the Church's history, and His Opportunistic-ness has realized that as long as his proclamations go against reality, his divine country club's membership will suffer (it would be a shame to lose that money--I mean...those souls). We can only hope that someday soon the Pope will see the light, and have it divinely revealed to him that birth control is not a sin, and that condoms are necessary to stop the spread of AIDS in Africa.
















